Here is an article on compromise (BIP156) between privacy and the complexity of Touko:
Ethereum: What is a compromise (bip156)
As the implementation of the cryptocurrency continues to grow, worries about the user’s privacy have become increasingly urgent. Although many cryptocurrencies prioritize decentralization and anonymity, some newer protocols, such as dandelion (BIP156), seek to achieve balance between safety and usability. However, this balance is not without compromise.
Dandelion, the new relayprotoko in terms of the retreat of cryptocurrency peer networks, has been considered significant in the improvement in the privacy of existing systems. Using the combination of techniques such as zero information (zkp) and gayorphic encryption (HE), butterflies allow users to trade without revealing their real identities or financial information.
But what does this mean exactly the complexity of the implementation? In order to understand the compromise between privacy and complexity, we need to consider the details of the BIP156 and its underlying mechanics.
What is zero -conscious evidence (zkp)?
The evidence of zero information is a kind of encryption protocol that allows users to disclose sensitive information without disclosing. They operate using advanced mathematical techniques, such as homomorphic encryption, to perform individuals from the details and ensure that the recipient remains as a result of the calculation.
In the case of dandelion, ZKPs allow users to sign events at minimal computational overhead costs, allowing the protocol to carry a large amount of transactions without significant security breaches. However, this also means that all errors or side channel attacks can potentially reveal sensitive information about the content of the event.
Homo -Momorphic encryption (they)
Homoomorphic encryption is another dandelion key component that allows users to make calculations of private information while maintaining its confidentiality and integrity. Using HE, events can be processed without revealing the underlying information, which makes it safer and convenient for users.
However, implementing gayorphic encryption requires significant expertise in the theory of encryption and computational complexity. This means that the developers must carefully balance the compromise between safety and usability, as excessive calculation overheads can endanger the general effect of the protocol.
Exchange between privacy and enforcement of the complexity
So what is the optimal compromise on the enhancement of the privacy of the dandelion promise and the complexity of its implementation? Although the BIP156 sacrifice a compelling combination of zero evidence and homoomorphic encryption, it also requires significant developmental skills and computational resources.
To implement this protocol, Wolders must place a considerable time and effort to place the underlying encryption infrastructure, including ZKPs, and he used in a dandelion. This may lead to higher operational costs of cryptocurrency and users, as well as increased safety risks if they are not properly controlled.
On the other hand, the implementation of advanced encryption techniques in the thesis requires significant expertise and resources, which may limit their introduction to a wider developer and users.
conclusion
As we constantly explore new ways to improve cryptocurrency safety and usability, it is necessary to weigh compromises between privacy and complexity. Although Dandelion (BIP156) provides a promising solution to improve the anonymity of the improved user, its dependence on advanced encryption techniques means that the potential benefits must be carefully balanced with the calculated overhead costs.